From today's NYT:

What other politician would say that about a photo showing a young babe sitting in his lap?

Subtle. (And I thought that Mac Collins ad was heavy handed!)

Democrats have it, says the WSJ.

Don't believe that he would--or could--run again? Check out his latest press release:

Like most, I'd assumed that the GOP's ridiculous, no-evidence-is-enough-evidence-for-us charges about Democratic involvement in the Foley revelations were part of a conscious strategy to muddy the moral waters in what has been, so far, an exclusively Republican scandal. But in an otherwise unremarkable piece in the Outlook section of yesterday's Washington Post, Byron York suggests a still more disturbing possibility.

I'd missed this in Friday's Post. It comes as no shock, but it's fascinating--and a little nauseating--to see its particulars:

On Fox News this afternoon, Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council said this:

Bush rejects Congress's effort to make him appoint FEMA chiefs who fulfill a minimum set of qualifications:

Bob Gibson of The Daily Progress reports that two more Allen acquaintances say he regularly used the N-word.